Product Code Database
Example Keywords: uncharted 2 -ipad $21-143
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Horses In Warfare
Tag Wiki 'Horses In Warfare'.
Tag

The first evidence of in dates from between 4000 and 3000 BC. A illustration of warfare from 2500 BC depicts some type of . By 1600 BC, improved and designs made chariot warfare common throughout the Ancient Near East, and the earliest written training manual for war horses was a guide for training chariot horses written about 1350 BC. As formal replaced the chariot, so did new training methods, and by 360 BC, the Greek cavalry officer had written an extensive treatise on horsemanship. The effectiveness of horses in battle was also revolutionized by improvements in , such as the invention of the , the , and the .

Many different types and sizes of horses were used in war, depending on the form of warfare. The type used varied with whether the horse was being ridden or driven, and whether they were being used for , cavalry charges, raiding, communication, or supply. Throughout history, and , as well as horses played a crucial role in providing support to armies in the field.

Horses were well suited to the warfare tactics of the cultures from the of Eastern Europe and . Several cultures in made extensive use of cavalry and chariots. warriors relied upon in their campaigns throughout , , and beginning in the 7th and 8th centuries AD. Europeans used several types of war horses in the , and the best-known warrior of the period was the armoured . With the decline of the knight and rise of gunpowder in warfare, light cavalry again rose to prominence, used in both European warfare and in the conquest of the . Battle cavalry developed to take on a multitude of roles in the late 18th century and early 19th century and was often crucial for victory in the . In the Americas, the use of horses and development of mounted warfare tactics were learned by several tribes of indigenous people and in turn, highly mobile horse regiments were critical in the American Civil War.

Horse cavalry began to be phased out after World War I in favour of , though a few horse cavalry units were still used into World War II, especially as scouts. By the end of World War II, horses were seldom seen in battle, but were still used extensively for the transport of troops and supplies. Today, formal battle-ready horse cavalry units have almost disappeared, though the United States Army Special Forces used horses in battle during the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan. Horses are still seen in use by organized armed fighters in the Global South. Many nations still maintain small units of mounted riders for patrol and , and military horse units are also used for ceremonial and educational purposes. Horses are also used for historical reenactment of battles, , and in competitions derived from the riding and training skills once used by the military.


Types of horse used in warfare
A fundamental principle of equine conformation is "form to function". Therefore, the type of horse used for various forms of warfare depended on the work performed, the weight a horse needed to carry or pull, and distance travelled. Weight affects speed and endurance, creating a trade-off: armour added protection, but added weight reduced maximum speed. Therefore, various cultures had different military needs. In some situations, one primary type of horse was favoured over all others. In other places, multiple types were needed; warriors would travel to battle riding a lighter horse of greater speed and endurance, and then switch to a heavier horse, with greater weight-carrying capacity, when wearing heavy armour in actual combat.

The average horse can carry up to approximately 30% of its body weight. While all horses can pull more weight than they can carry, the maximum weight that horses can pull varies widely, depending on the build of the horse, the type of vehicle, road conditions, and other factors. Horses to a wheeled vehicle on a paved road can pull as much as eight times their weight, but far less if pulling wheelless loads over unpaved terrain. Thus, horses that were driven varied in size and had to make a trade-off between speed and weight, just as did riding animals. Light horses could pull a small war chariot at speed. Heavy supply wagons, , and support vehicles were pulled by heavier horses or a larger number of horses. The method by which a horse was hitched to a vehicle also mattered: horses could pull greater weight with a than they could with a breast collar, and even less with an ox .


Light-weight
Light, such as the ancestors of the modern , , and were used for warfare that required speed, endurance, and agility. Such horses ranged from about to just under , weighing approximately . To move quickly, riders had to use lightweight and carry relatively light weapons such as bows, light spears, javelins, or later rifles. This was the original horse used for early chariot warfare, raiding, and light .

Relatively light horses were used by many cultures, including the , the , the , and the Native Americans. Throughout the Ancient Near East, small, light animals were used to pull chariots designed to carry no more than two passengers, a driver and a warrior. In the European , a lightweight war horse became known as the .


Medium-weight
Medium-weight horses developed as early as the with the needs of various civilizations to pull heavier loads, such as chariots capable of holding more than two people, and, as evolved into , to carry heavily armoured riders. The were among the earliest cultures to produce taller, heavier horses. Larger horses were also needed to pull supply wagons and, later on, artillery pieces. In Europe, horses were also used to a limited extent to maneuver on the battlefield as part of dedicated units. Medium-weight horses had the greatest range in size, from about but stocky, to as much as , weighing approximately . They generally were quite agile in combat, though they did not have the raw speed or endurance of a lighter horse. By the , larger horses in this class were sometimes called . They may have resembled modern or breeds. Later, horses similar to the modern often carried European cavalry.


Heavy-weight
Large, heavy horses, weighing from , the ancestors of today's , were used, particularly in Europe, from the onward. They pulled heavy loads like supply wagons and were disposed to remain calm in battle. Some historians believe they may have carried the heaviest-armoured of the Late Medieval Period, though others dispute this claim, indicating that the destrier, or knight's battle horse, was a medium-weight animal. It is also disputed whether the destrier class included draught animals or not. and Breeds at the smaller end of the heavyweight category may have included the ancestors of the , agile for their size and physically able to maneuver in battle.


Ponies
The British Army's 2nd Dragoons in 1813 had 340 ponies of and 55 ponies of ;
(2025). 9781843170938, Michael O'Mara Books Ltd.. .
the Lovat Scouts, formed in 1899, were mounted on Highland ponies; the British Army recruited 200 Dales ponies in World War II for use as pack and artillery animals; and the British Territorial Army experimented with the use of Dartmoor ponies as in 1935, finding them to be better than mules for the job.


Other equids
Horses were not the only used to support human warfare. have been used as pack animals from antiquity to the present. were also commonly used, especially as pack animals and to pull wagons, but also occasionally for riding. Because mules are often both calmer and hardier than horses, they were particularly useful for strenuous support tasks, such as hauling supplies over difficult terrain. However, under gunfire, they were less cooperative than horses, so were generally not used to haul on battlefields. The size of a mule and work to which it was put depended largely on the breeding of the that produced the mule. Mules could be lightweight, medium weight, or even, when produced from draught horse , of moderate heavy weight.


Training and deployment
The oldest known manual on training horses for chariot warfare was written c. 1350 BC by the horsemaster, . An ancient manual on the subject of training riding horses, particularly for the Ancient Greek cavalry is Hippike ( ) written about 360 BC by the Greek cavalry officer . and another early text was that of , written about 323 BC.

Whether horses were trained to pull chariots, to be ridden as light or heavy cavalry, or to carry the armoured knight, much training was required to overcome the horse's natural instinct to flee from noise, the smell of blood, and the confusion of combat. They also learned to accept any sudden or unusual movements of humans while using a weapon or avoiding one. Horses used in close combat may have been taught, or at least permitted, to kick, strike, and even bite, thus becoming weapons themselves for the warriors they carried.

In most cultures, a war horse used as a riding animal was trained to be controlled with limited use of , responding primarily to the rider's . The horse became accustomed to any necessary and protective armour placed upon it, and learned to balance under a rider who would also be laden with weapons and armour. Developing the balance and agility of the horse was crucial. The origins of the discipline of came from the need to train horses to be both obedient and manoeuvrable. The Haute ecole or "High School" movements of classical dressage taught today at the Spanish Riding School have their roots in manoeuvres designed for the battlefield. However, the airs above the ground were unlikely to have been used in actual combat, as most would have exposed the unprotected underbelly of the horse to the weapons of foot soldiers.

Horses used for were not only trained for combat conditions, but because many chariots were pulled by a team of two to four horses, they also had to learn to work together with other animals in close quarters under chaotic conditions.


Technological innovations
Horses were probably ridden in prehistory before they were driven. However, evidence is scant, mostly simple images of human figures on horse-like animals drawn on rock or clay.Trench, A History of Horsemanship, p. 16. The earliest tools used to control horses were of various sorts, which were invented nearly as soon as the horse was domesticated.Budiansky, The Nature of Horses, pp. 50–55. Evidence of bit wear appears on the teeth of horses excavated at the archaeology sites of the in northern , dated 3500–3000 BC.


Harness and vehicles
The invention of the wheel was a major technological innovation that gave rise to warfare. At first, equines, both horses and , were hitched to wheeled carts by means of a around their necks in a manner similar to that of .Pritchard, The Ancient Near East, illustration 97. However, such a design is incompatible with , limiting both the strength and mobility of the animal. By the time of the invasions of , c. 1600 BC, horses were pulling chariots with an improved design that made use of a breastcollar and breeching, which allowed a horse to move faster and pull more weight.

Even after the chariot had become obsolete as a tool of war, there still was a need for technological innovations in pulling technologies; horses were needed to pull heavy loads of supplies and weapons. The invention of the in China during the 5th century AD (Northern and Southern dynasties) allowed horses to pull greater weight than they could when hitched to a vehicle with the ox yokes or breast collars used in earlier times. The horse collar arrived in Europe during the 9th century, and became widespread by the 12th century.


Riding equipment
Two major innovations that revolutionised the effectiveness of mounted warriors in battle were the saddle and the stirrup. Riders quickly learned to pad their horse's backs to protect themselves from the horse's spine and , and fought on horseback for centuries with little more than a blanket or pad on the horse's back and a rudimentary bridle. To help distribute the rider's weight and protect the horse's back, some cultures created stuffed padding that resembles the panels of today's . Both the and used pads with added felt attached with a or around the horse's for increased security and comfort. Xenophon mentioned the use of a padded cloth on cavalry mounts as early as the 4th century BC.

The saddle with a solid framework, or "tree", provided a bearing surface to protect the horse from the weight of the rider, but was not widespread until the 2nd century AD. However, it made a critical difference, as horses could carry more weight when distributed across a solid saddle tree. A solid tree, the predecessor of today's , also allowed a more built-up seat to give the rider greater security in the saddle. The are credited with the invention of the solid-treed saddle.

An invention that made cavalry particularly effective was the stirrup. A toe loop that held the big toe was used in India possibly as early as 500 BC, and later a single stirrup was used as a mounting aid. The first set of paired stirrups appeared in China about 322 AD during the Jin dynasty. Following the invention of paired stirrups, which allowed a rider greater leverage with weapons, as well as both increased stability and mobility while mounted, nomadic groups such as the Mongols adopted this technology and developed a decisive military advantage. By the 7th century, due primarily to invaders from Central Asia, stirrup technology spread from Asia to Europe.Bennett, Dictionary of Ancient & Medieval Warfare, p. 300. The invaders are viewed as primarily responsible for spreading the use of the stirrup into central Europe.Curta, The Other Europe, p. 319

(2025). 9781846030253, Osprey Publishing Ltd.. .
However, while stirrups were known in Europe in the 8th century, pictorial and literary references to their use date only from the 9th century. Widespread use in Northern Europe, including England, is credited to the , who spread the stirrup in the 9th and 10th centuries to those areas.
(2025). 9780631216773, Blackwell Publishing. .


Tactics
The first evidence of horses used in warfare dates from between 4000 and 3000 BC in the of , in what today is , , and . Not long after domestication of the horse, people in these locations began to live together in large fortified towns for protection from the threat of horseback-riding raiders, who could attack and escape faster than people of more sedentary cultures could follow. Horse-mounted nomads of the and current day spread Indo-European Languages as they conquered other tribes and groups.Gat, Azar. "War in Human Civilization". Oxford University Press, 2006, p. 208.

The use of horses in organised warfare was documented early in recorded history. One of the first depictions is the "war panel" of the Standard of Ur, in , dated c. 2500 BC, showing horses (or possibly onagers or mules) pulling a four-wheeled wagon.


Chariot warfare
Among the earliest evidence of chariot use are the burials of horse and chariot remains by the Andronovo (Sintashta-Petrovka) culture in modern Russia and , dated to approximately 2000 BC. The oldest documentary evidence of what was probably chariot warfare in the Ancient Near East is the Old Hittite Anitta text, of the 18th century BC, which mentioned 40 teams of horses at the siege of . The became well known throughout the ancient world for their prowess with the chariot. Widespread use of the chariot in warfare across most of Eurasia coincides approximately with the development of the , known from c. 1600 BC. Further improvements in wheels and axles, as well as innovations in weaponry, soon resulted in chariots being driven in battle by societies from China to Egypt.

The invaders brought the chariot to in the 16th century BC and the Egyptians adopted its use from that time forward. The oldest preserved text related to the handling of war horses in the ancient world is the Hittite manual of , which dates to about 1350 BC, and describes the conditioning of chariot horses.

Chariots existed in the Minoan civilization, as they were inventoried on storage lists from in ,Adkins, Handbook to Life in Ancient Greece, pp. 94–95. dating to around 1450 BC.Willetts, "Minoans" in Penguin Encyclopedia of Ancient Civilizations p. 209. Chariots were also used in China as far back as the (c. 1600–1050 BC), where they appear in burials. The high point of chariot use in China was in the Spring and Autumn period (770–476 BC), although they continued in use up until the 2nd century BC.Bennett, Dictionary of Ancient & Medieval Warfare, p. 67.

Descriptions of the tactical role of chariots in and are rare. The , possibly referring to practices used c. 1250 BC, describes the use of chariots for transporting warriors to and from battle, rather than for actual fighting. Later, , invading Britain in 55 and 54 BC, noted British charioteers throwing javelins, then leaving their chariots to fight on foot.Warry, Warfare in the Classical World, pp. 220–221.


Cavalry
Some of the earliest examples of horses being ridden in warfare were or javelin-throwers, dating to the reigns of the rulers and . However, these riders sat far back on their horses, a precarious position for moving quickly, and the horses were held by a handler on the ground, keeping the archer free to use the bow. Thus, these archers were more a type of than true cavalry. The Assyrians developed in response to invasions by nomadic people from the north, such as the , who entered in the 8th century BC and took over parts of during the reign of , approximately 721 BC. Mounted warriors such as the also had an influence on the region in the 7th century BC. By the reign of in 669 BC, the Assyrians had learned to sit forward on their horses in the classic riding position still seen today and could be said to be true . The used both light horse scouts and heavy cavalry, although not extensively, possibly due to the cost of keeping horses.

was believed to have been developed by the Ancient , although others argue for the . By the time of Darius (558–486 BC), Persian military tactics required horses and riders that were completely armoured, and selectively bred a heavier, more muscled horse to carry the additional weight. The was a type of heavily armoured cavalry with distinct tactics, armour, and weaponry used from the time of the Persians up until the Middle Ages.

In , Phillip of Macedon is credited with developing tactics allowing massed cavalry charges.Pers Cavalcade p. 27 The most famous Greek heavy cavalry units were the companion cavalry of Alexander the Great.Chamberlin, Horse, pp. 154–158. The Chinese of the 4th century BC during the Warring States period (403–221 BC) began to use cavalry against rival states.Ebrey and others, Pre-Modern East Asia, pp. 29–30. To fight nomadic raiders from the north and west, the Chinese of the (202 BC – 220 AD) developed effective mounted units. Cavalry was not used extensively by the during the period, but by the time of the , they made use of heavy cavalry.Adkins, Handbook to Life in Ancient Rome, pp. 51–55. However, the backbone of the Roman army was the infantry.Whitby, Rome at War, pp. 19–21.


Horse artillery
Once gunpowder was invented, another major use of horses was as for , or . In addition to , where horse-drawn guns were attended by gunners on foot, many armies had artillery batteries where each gunner was provided with a mount. Horse artillery units generally used lighter pieces, pulled by six horses. "9-pounders" were pulled by eight horses, and heavier artillery pieces needed a team of twelve. With the individual riding horses required for officers, surgeons and other support staff, as well as those pulling the artillery guns and supply wagons, an artillery battery of six guns could require 160 to 200 horses. Horse artillery usually came under the command of cavalry divisions, but in some battles, such as Waterloo, the horse artillery were used as a rapid response force, repulsing attacks and assisting the infantry. Agility was important; the ideal artillery horse was high, strongly built, but able to move quickly.


Asia

Central Asia
Relations between nomads and the settled people in and around were often marked by conflict. The nomadic lifestyle was well suited to warfare, and steppe cavalry became some of the most militarily potent forces in the world, only limited by nomads' frequent lack of internal unity. Periodically, strong leaders would organise several tribes into one force, creating an almost unstoppable power. These unified groups included the , who invaded Europe, and under Attila, conducted campaigns in both eastern France and northern Italy, over 500 miles apart, within two successive campaign seasons. Other unified nomadic forces included the rebellions in China, and the Mongol conquest of much of Eurasia.


South Asia
The literature of ancient describes numerous horse nomads. Some of the earliest references to the use of horses in South Asian warfare are texts, which refer to an attempted invasion of India by the joint cavalry forces of the , , , , and , called the "five hordes" ( pañca.ganah) or "" hordes ( Kśatriya ganah). About 1600 BC, they captured the throne of by dethroning the king, Bahu. Later texts, such as the Mahābhārata, c. 950 BC, appear to recognise efforts taken to war horses and develop trained mounted warriors, stating that the horses of the and Kamboja regions were of the finest quality, and the Kambojas, Gandharas, and Yavanas were expert in fighting from horses.Sinha, Post-Gupta Polity (A.D. 500–750), p. 136.

In technological innovation, the early toe loop stirrup is credited to the cultures of India, and may have been in use as early as 500 BC. Not long after, the cultures of and clashed with those of central Asia and India. (484–425 BC) wrote that mercenaries of the Achaemenid Empire were recruited into the army of emperor Xerxes I of Persia (486–465 BC), which he led against the Greeks.Herodotus, IV.65–66. A century later, the "Men of the Mountain Land," from north of , served in the army of Darius III of Persia when he fought against Alexander the Great at Arbela in 331 BC. In battle against Alexander at Massaga in 326 BC, the Assakenoi forces included 20,000 cavalry.Sastri, Age of the Nandas and Mauryas, p. 49. The recounted how cavalry of the Shakas, Yavanas, Kambojas, , , and helped Chandragupta Maurya (c. 320–298 BC) defeat the ruler of Magadha and take the throne, thus laying the foundations of in Northern India.Mudra-Rakshasa II.

cavalry used gunpowder weapons, but were slow to replace the traditional composite bow.Gordon, The Limited Adoption of European-style Military Forces by Eighteenth Century Rulers in India, pp. 229–232. Under the impact of European military successes in India, some Indian rulers adopted the European system of massed cavalry charges, although others did not.Gordon, The Limited Adoption of European-style Military Forces by Eighteenth Century Rulers in India, p. 241. By the 18th century, Indian armies continued to field cavalry, but mainly of the heavy variety.


East Asia
The Chinese used chariots for horse-based warfare until light cavalry forces became common during the Warring States era (402–221 BC). A major proponent of the change to riding horses from chariots was Wu Ling, c. 320 BC. However, conservative forces in China often opposed change, as cavalry did not benefit from the additional cachet attached to being the military branch dominated by the nobility as in medieval Europe. Nevertheless, during the reign of Emperor Wu of Han (r. 141–87 BC), it is recorded that 300,000 government-owned horses were insufficient for the cavalry and of the Han military in to expel the nomads from the , , Khangai Mountains and , spurring new policies that encouraged households to hand over privately-bred horses in exchange for military and corvee labor exemptions.Di Cosmo, Nicola, (2002), Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, , pp. 232, 237–240.

The Japanese fought as cavalry for many centuries.Turnbull, War in Japan, pp. 15–20. They were particularly skilled in the art of using archery from horseback. The archery skills of mounted samurai were developed by training such as , which originated in 530 AD and reached its peak under Minamoto no Yoritomo (1147–1199 AD) in the . They switched from an emphasis on to mounted spearmen during the (1467–1615 AD).


Middle East
During the period when various controlled much of the as well as parts of and the Iberian peninsula, armies consisted mostly of cavalry, made up of fighters from various local groups, and tribesmen. The latter were considered particularly skilled as both and from horseback. In the 9th century the use of , slaves raised to be soldiers for various Muslim rulers, became increasingly common. Mobile tactics, advanced breeding of horses, and detailed training manuals made Mamluk cavalry a highly efficient fighting force. The use of armies consisting mostly of cavalry continued among the Turkish people who founded the . Their need for large mounted forces led to an establishment of the , cavalry soldiers who were granted lands in exchange for providing in times of war.

Mounted Muslim warriors conquered North Africa and the Iberian Peninsula during the 7th and 8th centuries AD following the , of in 622 AD. By 630 AD, their influence expanded across the and into western . By 711 AD, the light cavalry of Muslim warriors had reached Spain, and controlled most of the Iberian peninsula by 720. Their mounts were of various oriental types, including the North African Barb. A few may have come with the who settled in the valley. Another strain of horse that came with Islamic invaders was the . Muslim invaders travelled north from present-day Spain into France, where they were defeated by the ruler at the Battle of Tours in 732 AD.


Europe

Antiquity

Middle Ages
During the European , there were three primary types of war horses: the , the courser, and the , which differed in size and usage. A generic word used to describe medieval war horses was charger, which appears interchangeable with the other terms. The medieval war horse was of moderate size, rarely exceeding . Heavy horses were logistically difficult to maintain and less adaptable to varied terrains. The destrier of the early Middle Ages was moderately larger than the courser or rouncey, in part to accommodate heavier armoured . However, destriers were not as large as , averaging between and . On the European continent, the need to carry more armour against mounted enemies such as the and led to the developing heavier, bigger horses. As the amount of armour and equipment increased in the later Middle Ages, the height of the horses increased; some late medieval horse skeletons were of horses over .

were often used as destriers due to their natural aggression. However, there may have been some use of by European warriors, and mares, who were quieter and less likely to call out and betray their position to the enemy, were the preferred war horse of the , who invaded various parts of Southern Europe from 700 AD through the 15th century. were used in war by the , and known as "monk horses" ( or Mönchhengste). One advantage was if captured by the enemy, they could not be used to improve local bloodstock, thus maintaining the Knights' superiority in horseflesh.

(1998). 9780860786795, Ashgate.


Uses
The heavy cavalry charge, while it could be effective, was not a common occurrence. Battles were rarely fought on land suitable for heavy cavalry. While mounted riders remained effective for initial attacks, by the end of the 14th century, it was common for knights to dismount to fight, while their horses were sent to the rear, kept ready for pursuit. were avoided if possible, with most offensive in the early Middle Ages taking the form of , and in the later Middle Ages as mounted raids called chevauchées, with lightly armed warriors on swift horses.

The war horse was also seen in  – martial war games such as the , which began in the 11th century both as sport and to provide training for battle. Specialised destriers were bred for the purpose, although the expense of keeping, training, and outfitting them kept the majority of the population from owning one. While some historians suggest that the tournament had become a theatrical event by the 15th and 16th centuries, others argue that continued to help cavalry train for battle until the Thirty Years' War.


Transition
The decline of the armoured knight was probably linked to changing structures of armies and various economic factors, and not obsolescence due to new technologies. However, some historians attribute the demise of the knight to the invention of , or to the . Some link the decline to both technologies. Others argue these technologies actually contributed to the development of knights: was first developed to resist early medieval bolts,Williams, "The Metallurgy of Medieval Arms and Armour" in Companion to Medieval Arms and Armour, pp. 51–54. and the full harness worn by the early 15th century developed to resist longbow arrows. From the 14th century onwards, most plate was made from hardened steel, which resisted early musket ammunition. In addition, stronger designs did not make plate heavier; a full harness of musket-proof plate from the 17th century weighed , significantly less than 16th century tournament armour.

The move to predominately infantry-based battles from 1300 to 1550 was linked to both improved and changes in weaponry. By the 16th century, the concept of a combined-arms professional army had spread throughout Europe.Carey and others, Warfare in the Medieval World, pp. 149–50, 200–02. Professional armies emphasized training, and were paid via contracts, a change from the ransom and pillaging which reimbursed knights in the past. When coupled with the rising costs involved in outfitting and maintaining armour and horses, the traditional knightly classes began to abandon their profession.Robards, The Medieval Knight at War, p. 152. Light horses, or prickers, were still used for scouting and reconnaissance; they also provided a defensive screen for marching armies. Large teams of draught horses or pulled the heavy early . Other horses pulled wagons and carried supplies for the armies.


Early modern period
During the early modern period the shift continued from heavy cavalry and the armoured knight to unarmoured , including and Chasseurs à cheval.
(2025). 9780618127429, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Light cavalry facilitated better communication, using fast, agile horses to move quickly across battlefields. The ratio of footmen to horsemen also increased over the period as infantry weapons improved and footmen became more mobile and versatile, particularly once the musket replaced the more cumbersome pike. During the , mounted units included , heavily armoured and equipped with lances; light cavalry, who wore mail and bore light lances and pistols; and "", who carried an early . As heavy cavalry use declined armour was increasingly abandoned and , whose horses were rarely used in combat, became more common: provided reconnaissance, escort and security. However, many generals still used the heavy mounted charge, from the late 17th century and early 18th century, where sword-wielding wedge-formation shock troops penetrated enemy lines, to the early 19th century, where armoured heavy cuirassiers were employed.

Light cavalry continued to play a major role, particularly after the Seven Years' War when Hussars started to play a larger part in battles.

(2025). 9781841765242, Osprey.
Though some leaders preferred tall horses for their mounted troops this was as much for prestige as for increased shock ability and many troops used more typical horses, averaging 15 hands. Cavalry tactics altered with fewer mounted charges, more reliance on drilled maneuvers at the trot, and use of firearms once within range. Ever-more elaborate movements, such as wheeling and , were developed to facilitate the use of firearms from horseback. These tactics were not greatly successful in battle since protected by could deny cavalry room to manoeuvre. However the advanced required survives into the modern world as . While restricted, cavalry was not rendered obsolete. As infantry formations developed in tactics and skills, artillery became essential to break formations; in turn, cavalry was required to both combat enemy artillery, which was susceptible to cavalry while deploying, and to charge enemy infantry formations broken by artillery fire. Thus, successful warfare depended in a balance of the three arms: cavalry, artillery and infantry.

As regimental structures developed many units selected horses of uniform type and some, such as the Royal Scots Greys, even specified colour. Trumpeters often rode distinctive horses so they stood out. Regional armies developed type preferences, such as British , Hanoverians in central Europe, and of the , but once in the field, the lack of supplies typical of wartime meant that horses of all types were used. Since horses were such a vital component of most armies in early modern Europe, many instituted state stud farms to breed horses for the military. However, in wartime, supply rarely matched the demand, resulting in some cavalry troops fighting on foot.


19th century
In the 19th century distinctions between heavy and light cavalry became less significant; by the end of the , heavy cavalry were performing the scouting and outpost duties previously undertaken by light cavalry, and by the end of the 19th century the roles had effectively merged. Most armies at the time preferred cavalry horses to stand and weigh , although frequently had heavier horses. Lighter horses were used for scouting and raiding. Cavalry horses were generally obtained at 5 years of age and were in service from 10 to 12 years, barring loss. However losses of 30–40% were common during a campaign due to conditions of the march as well as enemy action. Mares and were preferred over less-easily managed stallions.

During the French Revolutionary Wars and the the cavalry's main offensive role was as shock troops. In defence cavalry were used to attack and harass the enemy's infantry flanks as they advanced. Cavalry were frequently used prior to an infantry assault, to force an infantry line to break and reform into formations vulnerable to infantry or artillery. Infantry frequently followed behind in order to secure any ground won or the cavalry could be used to break up enemy lines following a successful infantry action.

Mounted charges were carefully managed. A charge's maximum speed was 20 km/h; moving faster resulted in a break in formation and fatigued horses. Charges occurred across clear rising ground, and were effective against infantry both on the march and when deployed in a line or column. A foot formed in line was vulnerable to cavalry, and could be broken or destroyed by a well-formed charge. Traditional cavalry functions altered by the end of the 19th century. Many cavalry units transferred in title and role to "mounted rifles": troops trained to fight on foot, but retaining mounts for rapid deployment, as well as for patrols, scouting, communications, and defensive screening. These troops differed from , who used horses for transport but did not perform the old cavalry roles of reconnaissance and support.


Sub-Saharan Africa
Horses were used for warfare in the central Sudan since the 9th century, where they were considered "the most precious commodity following the slave."Azevedo, Roots of Violence, p. 54 The first conclusive evidence of horses playing a major role in the warfare of dates to the 11th century when the region was controlled by the , a Muslim dynasty. During the 13th and 14th centuries, cavalry became an important factor in the area. This coincided with the introduction of larger breeds of horse and the widespread adoption of saddles and stirrups. Increased mobility played a part in the formation of new power centers, such as the in what today is . The authority of many African Islamic states such as the also rested in large part on their ability to subject neighboring peoples with cavalry. Despite harsh climate conditions, endemic diseases such as , the African horse sickness, and unsuitable terrain that limited the effectiveness of horses in many parts of Africa, horses were continuously imported and were, in some areas, a vital instrument of war. The introduction of horses also intensified existing conflicts, such as those between the and in Namibia during the 19th century.

The African slave trade was closely tied to the imports of war horses, and as the prevalence of slaving decreased, fewer horses were needed for raiding. This significantly decreased the amount of mounted warfare seen in West Africa. By the time of the Scramble for Africa and the introduction of modern firearms in the 1880s, the use of horses in African warfare had lost most of its effectiveness. Nonetheless, in during the Second Boer War (1899–1902), cavalry and other mounted troops were the major combat force for the British, since the horse-mounted Boers moved too quickly for infantry to engage. The Boers presented a mobile and innovative approach to warfare, drawing on strategies that had first appeared in the American Civil War. The terrain was not well-suited to the British horses, resulting in the loss of over 300,000 animals. As the campaign wore on, losses were replaced by more durable African , and from .


Ethiopia
Https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2231705< /ref> At some point people learned to breed donkey, introduced from the Arabian Penninsula, and horse to produce mules (which would become a common mode of transport for in mountainous areas). Equestrians and horse warriors in Ethiopia were called Feresenya (: ፈረስኛ), equivalent to the Arabic , which was also the version of knight in . The first named horse in the region's history was that of Amda Seyon I in his royal chronicle "The Glorious Victories." This would set the groundwork for the in Pankhrust, R. (1989). The Early History of Ethiopian Horse-Names. Paideuma Bd, 35, 197–206. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40733033, and the majority of horses were named for their coats or temperament. The Oromo, however, initially had no horses and would aquire them well into their from Somalis. Later descriptions of Ethiopia state "The kings and nobilities of the country were reported to have strong and beautiful horses which were used not only to travel from one area to another but also for warfare purposes during territorial expansion and the fight against rebels and for hunting activities" (Pankhrust, 1989, pp. 197–199). In relation to the utilization of horses by (earlier) Ethiopians, Augustus Blandy Wylde asserts that "the war horses used by the upper classes are consistently well kept and some of them are very fine animals."Wylde, A. B. (1901). Modern Abyssinia. Methuen & Co. 36 Essex Street W.C., p. 290 Ethiopian horses are also usually seen with unique tacks of leather and wool similar to those of the and Arabia with metal disk ornaments decorating the forehead, breast collar, and running along the croup. Traditional saddles are colorful with depictions of Lions on the . Historically, single-toe stirrups similar to those found in India were used. Horses are commonplace in Ethiopian Orthodox holiday celebrations and the are known for having hosted a horse festival in since the 1940s.Top 10 Highlights of the Agew Equestrian Festival: Celebrating 82 Years of History & Culture, Addis Insight, February 1, 2023 Likewise, depictions of horses in are very common, particularly that of .

The Ethiopian riding style involves a unique approach characterized by single control, often without a bit, and mounting from the right side (unlike most others). Traditionally, warriors in wore circular shields strapped to their forearm with weapons carried on their right side and wielded in their dominant hand. This left their shield hand, and only their shield hand, to steer the horse. Rugged terrain and varying altitudes required riders to be fit and adaptable, and don't follow the same signals as their European trained counterparts.


The Americas
The horse had been extinct in the Western Hemisphere for approximately 10,000 years prior to the arrival of Spanish in the early 16th century. Consequently, the Indigenous peoples of the Americas had no warfare technologies that could overcome the considerable advantage provided by European horses and gunpowder weapons. In particular this resulted in the conquest of the and Inca empires. The speed and increased impact of cavalry contributed to a number of early victories by European fighters in open terrain, though their success was limited in more mountainous regions.Parker, Warfare, p. 143. The Incas' well-maintained roads in the enabled quick mounted raids, such as those undertaken by the Spanish while resisting the siege of Cuzco in 1536–37.

Indigenous populations of South America soon learned to use horses. In Chile, the began using cavalry in the in 1586. They drove the Spanish out of Araucanía at the beginning of the 17th century. Later, the Mapuche conducted mounted raids known as Malónes, first on Spanish, then on Chilean and Argentine settlements until well into the 19th century.Jones, "Warfare Reorganization and Readaptation at the Margins of Spanish Rule" in The Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas, pp. 138–187. In North America, Native Americans also quickly learned to use horses. In particular, the people of the , such as the and the , became renowned horseback fighters. By the 19th century, they presented a formidable force against the United States Army.

During the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783), the made relatively little use of cavalry, primarily relying on infantry and a few dragoon regiments. The United States Congress eventually authorized regiments specifically designated as cavalry in 1855. The newly formed American cavalry adopted tactics based on experiences fighting over vast distances during the Mexican War (1846–1848) and against indigenous peoples on the western frontier, abandoning some European traditions.

During the American Civil War (1861–1865), cavalry held the most important and respected role it would ever hold in the American military. Field artillery in the American Civil War was also highly mobile. Both horses and mules pulled the guns, though only horses were used on the battlefield. At the beginning of the war, most of the experienced cavalry officers were from the South and thus joined the Confederacy, leading to the 's initial battlefield superiority. The tide turned at the 1863 Battle of Brandy Station, part of the Gettysburg campaign, where the , in the largest cavalry battle ever fought on the American continent, ended the dominance of the South. By 1865, Union cavalry were decisive in achieving victory. So important were horses to individual soldiers that the surrender terms at Appomattox allowed every Confederate cavalryman to take his horse home with him. This was because, unlike their Union counterparts, Confederate cavalrymen provided their own horses for service instead of drawing them from the government.


20th century
Although cavalry was used extensively throughout the world during the 19th century, horses became less important in warfare at the beginning of the 20th century. was still seen on the battlefield, but formal mounted cavalry began to be phased out for combat during and immediately after World War I, although units that included horses still had military uses well into World War II.


World War I
World War I saw great changes in the use of cavalry. The mode of warfare changed, and the use of , and rendered traditional cavalry almost obsolete. , introduced in 1917, began to take over the role of shock combat.

Early in the War, cavalry skirmishes were common, and horse-mounted troops widely used for reconnaissance.Willmott, First World War, p. 46. On the Western Front cavalry were an effective flanking force during the "Race to the Sea" in 1914, but were less useful once was established.Willmott, First World War, p. 60.Willmott, First World War, p. 99. There a few examples of successful shock combat, and cavalry divisions also provided important mobile firepower. Cavalry played a greater role on the Eastern Front, where trench warfare was less common. On the Eastern Front, and also against the , the "cavalry was literally indispensable." cavalry proved adaptable, since they were trained to fight both on foot and while mounted, while other European cavalry relied primarily on shock action.

On both fronts, the horse was also used as a . Because railway lines could not withstand artillery bombardments, horses carried ammunition and supplies between the railheads and the rear trenches, though the horses generally were not used in the actual trench zone. This role of horses was critical, and thus horse was the single largest commodity shipped to the front by some countries. Following the war, many cavalry regiments were converted to mechanised, armoured divisions, with light tanks developed to perform many of the cavalry's original roles.


World War II
Several nations used horse units during World War II. The army used mounted infantry to defend against the armies of during the 1939 invasion.Davies, God's Playground Volume II, pp. 324–325. Both the Germans and the maintained cavalry units throughout the war, particularly on the Eastern Front. The British Army used horses early in the war, and the final British cavalry charge was on March 21, 1942, when the Burma Frontier Force encountered infantry in central . The only American cavalry unit during World War II was the 26th Cavalry. They challenged the Japanese invaders of , holding off armoured and infantry regiments during the invasion of the Philippines, repelled a unit of tanks in , and successfully held ground for the Allied armies' retreat to Bataan.

Throughout the war, horses and mules were an essential form of transport, especially by the British in the rough terrain of and the . The United States Army utilised a few cavalry and supply units during the war, but there were concerns that the Americans did not use horses often enough. In the campaigns in , generals such as George S. Patton lamented their lack, saying, "had we possessed an American cavalry division with pack artillery in Tunisia and in Sicily, not a German would have escaped."

The German and the Soviet armies used horses until the end of the war for transportation of troops and supplies. The German Army, strapped for motorised transport because its factories were needed to produce tanks and aircraft, used around 2.75 million horses – more than it had used in World War I. One German infantry division in Normandy in 1944 had 5,000 horses. The Soviets used 3.5 million horses.


Recognition
While many statues and memorials have been erected to human heroes of war, often shown with horses, a few have also been created specifically to honor horses or animals in general. One example is the in in the province of . Both horses and mules are honored in the Animals in War Memorial in London's Hyde Park.

Horses have also at times received medals for extraordinary deeds. After the Charge of the Light Brigade during the , a surviving horse named Drummer Boy, ridden by an officer of the 8th Hussars, was given an unofficial campaign medal by his rider that was identical to those awarded to British troops who served in the Crimea, engraved with the horse's name and an inscription of his service. A more formal award was the PDSA , an animals' equivalent of the , awarded by the People's Dispensary for Sick Animals charity in the United Kingdom to three horses that served in World War II.


Modern uses
Today, many of the historical military uses of the horse have evolved into peacetime applications, including exhibitions, historical reenactments, work of peace officers, and competitive events. Formal combat units of mounted cavalry are mostly a thing of the past, with horseback units within the modern military used for reconnaissance, ceremonial, or crowd control purposes. With the rise of mechanised technology, horses in formal national militias were displaced by and armored fighting vehicles, often still referred to as "cavalry".


Active military
Organised armed fighters on horseback are occasionally seen. The best-known current examples are the , militia groups seen in the region of , who became notorious for their attacks upon unarmed civilian populations in the Darfur conflict. Many nations still maintain small numbers of mounted military units for certain types of patrol and reconnaissance duties in extremely rugged terrain, including the conflict in . Horses and donkeys have been used by Russia's army for supply and reinforcement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as vehicular resupply became dangerous due to the prevalence of attack drones.

At the beginning of Operation Enduring Freedom, Operational Detachment Alpha 595 teams were covertly inserted into Afghanistan on October 19, 2001.

(2025). 9780160729584, Combat studies institute Press.
Horses were the only suitable method of transport in the difficult mountainous terrain of Northern Afghanistan. They were the first U.S. soldiers to ride horses into battle since January 16, 1942, when the U.S. Army’s 26th Cavalry Regiment charged an advanced guard of the 14th Japanese Army as it advanced from Manila.

The only remaining operationally ready, fully horse-mounted regular in the world is the 's 61st Cavalry.


Law enforcement and public safety
have been used since the 18th century, and still are used worldwide to control traffic and crowds, patrol public parks, keep order in processionals and during ceremonies and perform general street patrol duties. Today, many cities still have mounted police units. In rural areas, horses are used by law enforcement for mounted patrols over rugged terrain, crowd control at religious shrines, and border patrol.

In rural areas, law enforcement that operates outside of incorporated cities may also have mounted units. These include specially deputised, paid or volunteer mounted search and rescue units sent into roadless areas on horseback to locate missing people.For example: Law enforcement in may use horses in places where mechanised transport is difficult or prohibited. Horses can be an essential part of an overall team effort as they can move faster on the ground than a human on foot, can transport heavy equipment, and provide a more rested rescue worker when a subject is found.


Ceremonial and educational uses
Many countries throughout the world maintain traditionally trained and historically uniformed cavalry units for ceremonial, exhibition, or educational purposes. One example is the Horse Cavalry Detachment of the U.S. Army's 1st Cavalry Division. This unit of active duty soldiers approximates the weapons, tools, equipment and techniques used by the United States Cavalry in the 1880s. It is seen at change of command ceremonies and other public appearances. A similar detachment is the Governor General's Horse Guards, Canada's Household Cavalry regiment, the last remaining mounted cavalry unit in the Canadian Forces. 's King's Household Cavalry is a ceremonial unit with over 100 horses and is the remainder of the Nepalese cavalry that existed since the 19th century. An important ceremonial use is in military funerals, which often have a caparisoned horse as part of the procession, "to symbolize that the warrior will never ride again".

Horses are also used in many historical reenactments.See for example and Reenactors try to recreate the conditions of the battle or tournament with equipment that is as authentic as possible.


Equestrian sport
Modern-day Olympic equestrian events are rooted in cavalry skills and classical horsemanship.Bryant, Olympic Equestrian, pp. 14–15. The first equestrian events at the Olympics were introduced in 1912, and through 1948, competition was restricted to active-duty officers on military horses. Only after 1952, as mechanisation of warfare reduced the number of military riders, were civilian riders allowed to compete. Dressage traces its origins to and his works on cavalry training methods, developing further during the in response to a need for different tactics in battles where firearms were used. The three-phase competition known as developed out of cavalry officers' needs for versatile, well-schooled horses.Price & Burt, The American Quarter Horse, p. 238. Though developed largely from , the cavalry considered jumping to be good training for their horses, and leaders in the development of modern riding techniques over fences, such as Federico Caprilli, came from military ranks. Beyond the Olympic disciplines are other events with military roots. Competitions with weapons, such as mounted shooting and , test the combat skills of mounted riders.


See also
  • Great Stirrup Controversy
  • List of historical military horses
  • French cavalry during World War I


Notes


Sources


Further reading
  • , "The Rise and Fall of Warhorses" (review of , Raiders, Rulers, and Traders: The Horse and the Rise of Empires, Norton, 2024, 424 pp.), The New York Review of Books, vol. LXXII, no. 6 (10 April 2025), pp. 17–19. "Unlike cows, , whose teeth are quite dull, pull up grass by the roots rather than biting off the blades, or they nibble it right down to the ground, thus quickly destroying the land, which may require some years to recover.... Horses in the wild... range constantly to find new territory... The horse came to symbolize through its own natural . The bred horses and nomadic .... Men waged to get other people's horses so that they could wage war. ... remained the basic unit of power for centuries.... But the people of the steppes never succeeded in conquering the part of the world west of the and the , nor .... where ... was decisive." (p. 17.)
  • Harrison, Sunny (2022). "". Journal of Medieval History.


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
7s Time